|
May 05
2009
|
The theory behind democracy is that the collective population joins their fee thinking minds in order to elect a person who shall best serve them through the rule of governance. This theory works on a global scale and is essentially infallible as the governments of the independent nations are accountable to their people. So why then has this "democracy", which has been glorified to such an ideological status, left us as South Africans with such authoritarian ineptitude and near autocratic rule? Who are we to question the now all-powerful, all-caring, all-bullshit ANC? The people have spoken and now Jacob is dancing. Because it was all a democratic process we're hailed as the jewel of Africa, which is kind of like winning a gold at the special Olympics, but hey, we all love the Blade Runner right? Forget the corruption, forget the nepotism, and forget the fact that a song about a fully automatic weapon is slowly becoming our new national anthem. Out of just under 50 million people is this the best possible individual to lead this country? I think you can postulate as to what my answer shall be. So is our democratic process working? Is it as watertight as it claims to be? The single criteria that someone needs to fulfil in order to have their say is to be a South African citizen over 18 years of age, and that's a test even Julius could pass. I have a few different hypotheses about what should qualify a voter to mark his or her X, because at this point in time there is something very wrong about a system that allows this idiot to power, something very wrong indeed. And before I am chastised and labelled a racist colonialist for my suggestions please bear in mind one thing: the ANC is part of the tri-partite alliance. They are controlled by Blade Nzimande and his communist comrades, and ask North Koreans how that kind of democracy is working for them.
